LBP联合HR-HPV检测宫颈病变的应用分析  

Application and analysis of LBP method united with HR-HPV in detecting cervix uteri pathological changes

作　　者：张蓉[1] 李力[1] 郑秀惠[1] 钟小林[1] 郭建新[1] 黄寅虎[1] 

机构地区：[1]第三军医大学大坪医院野战外科研究所妇产科,重庆400042

出　　处：《现代生物医学进展》2009年第23期4490-4491,共2页Progress in Modern Biomedicine

摘　　要：目的:分析比较LBP检测、HR-HPV检测对宫颈病变的筛查效果,探讨两者在宫颈病变检测中的相关性。方法:回顾性分析我院妇科门诊就诊的892名患者进行LBP、HR-HPV、LBP+HR-HPV检测的结果,比较它们之间的优劣性。结果:892例患者中用LBP和HPV检测呈单项阳性的分别为185例和181例,各单项检出率为20.7%和20.3%,而上述结果中呈双项阳性的患者只有146例,检出率仅为16.4%;LBP联合HR-HPV检测呈阳性的为678例,检出率达到76.0%,两种方法检测率之间差异无统计学意义,P<0.05。结论:两种方法的检测结果以及异常程度和感染量之间均无相关性,而两种方法联合使用可显著提高检出率,更有利于宫颈病变早期预防。Objective：To investigate the relationship between the cervix uteri pathological change and the LBP and HR-HPV examination by comparing their effects.Methods：892 patients in our department were undergone the LBP,HPV and LBP＋HPV examination,and results were compared.Results：Among the 892 cases,185 cases and 181 cases were tested single-positive by LBP and HPV method respectively,with the respective single detection rate of 20.7%and 20.3%,while 146 case were found positive by both LBP and HPV methods,with the detection rate of 16.4%.However,678 cases were tested positive by LBP combined HR-HPV method,with the detection rate of 76.0%.There is no statistically significant difference between the two methods,P〈0.05.Conclusion：There is no relevance between the two methods of LBP and HPV examination and the unusual degree and the infection quantity.However,the combined method of LBP and HPV could significantly increase the detection rate,thus is more conducive to early prevention of cervix uteri pathological change.

关 键 词：宫颈病变 LBP、HR-HPV 

分 类 号：R711.74[医药卫生—妇产科学] R737.33[医药卫生—临床医学]