杜甫与丁茶山“三吏”叙事特点之比较:“主客融合”与“主客分离”  

A Comparison of Narrative Characteristics Between Du Fu's Integration of Subject and Ding Chashan's Separation of Subject and Object

作　　者：孙玉霞[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学少数民族语言文学院,博士在读北京100081 [2]北京第二外国语学院朝鲜语系,讲师北京100024

出　　处：《湖北广播电视大学学报》2010年第3期77-79,共3页Journal of Hubei Radio & Television University

摘　　要：主客的"融合"与"分离"原是用于评说汉赋的创作特点,本文借此术语概括杜甫与茶山叙事诗的不同特点。诗圣杜甫亲历了给唐代社会和人民带来巨大灾难的安史之乱,创作了以"三吏"为代表的大量叙事诗,其融叙事、抒情、议论为一体的艺术手法为无数后人推崇和仿效。相距千年,18世纪末在朝鲜半岛诞生了有"杜甫还生"之称的实学思想家和诗人丁茶山。丁茶山面对朝鲜王朝末期传统社会体系崩溃前危机四伏的封建统治、混乱不堪的政治经济、水深火热中挣扎的劳苦百姓,写出了许多反映现实的叙事诗,最高成就之一是对杜甫三吏的效仿之作。本文以杜甫与丁茶山的"三吏"为例,探讨两位伟大的诗人在诗歌叙事中,表现出的"主客融合"与"主客分离"的不同特点。The Integration and Separation of Subject and Object which was used to describe the writing characteristics of Hanfu is used in this paper to summarize the differences between Du Fu＇s and Ding Chashanin＇s narrative poems. Poet-sage Du Fu experienced Anshi Riots which was devastative for Tang Society and its people. Basing on this experience, Du Fu created a large number of narrative poems represented by Sanli. The style of Sanli was a combination of narration, lyric and argumentation which was respected and imitated by later generations. A thousand years later, Ding Chashan, the so-called Regeneration of Du Fu and a practical thinker and poet, was born on the Korean Peninsular. Ding Chashan wrote many narrative poems reflecting the Korean society at the late period of Korean Dynasty in which the Fudal political and economic system were collapsing and its people were struggling. The highest achievement of Ding Chashan was his imitation of Du Fu＇s Sanli. Using Du Fu＇s Sanli and Ding Chashan＇s Sanli as examples, this paper is to discuss the differences between Du Fu＇s Integration of Subiect and Object and Dine Chashan＇s Separation of Subject and Object.

关 键 词：杜甫 丁茶山 三吏 叙事特点 主客融合 主客分离 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]