检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李永伟[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉科技大学文法与经济学院,湖北武汉430081
出 处:《武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第1期12-15,共4页Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:当前我国法制建设在制度移植与重生方面面临着一种困境,即法制建设究竟是应该整理传统以利用本土资源并进而实现传统的创造性转化,还是应该以西方制度演化史所积淀的现代法制模式为榜样进行整体或局部的法律移植,学界对此亦存在相当的论争。然而值得怀疑的是,这些不同角度的理论进路究竟在多大程度上能给当前的困境提供一种出路,甚而有学者以为当前的制度变革本就无解。The legislative construction in China is facing a difficult position in systemic transplantation and reconstruction. The debate is whether the legislative construction in China should base itself on tradition reorganization and use of native resources for creative transformation of tradition or on whole or partial legal transplantation by learning from modern legal system pattern in the west. Moreover, it is dubious that these different theoretical perspectives are able to provide a resolution to the current difficult position, and some scholars even suggest that the current systemic transformation in China has no solution at all.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28