检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学草地资源与生态实验室,北京100083 [2]北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京100083
出 处:《草业科学》2010年第2期24-27,共4页Pratacultural Science
基 金:"十一五"国家科技支撑项目"奶业优质饲草生产技术研究开发"子课题"西北地区高效林草间作模式与技术体系研究"(2006BAD04A04-06-08)
摘 要:综合分析和评价了啤特果树Pyrusussurignsis-紫花苜蓿Medicagosativa、啤特果树-小麦Triticumaestivum两种复合系统的生态学效应和经济效益。结果表明:啤特果树-紫花苜蓿复合系统和啤特果树-小麦复合系统的土壤客重分别为1.39和1.45g/cm^3。啤特果树-紫花苜蓿复合系统中非毛管孔隙度(4.72%)和总孔隙度(58.96%)均大于啤特果树一小麦复合系统中非毛管孔隙度(4.15%)和总孔隙度(50.80%),说明林下种植紫花苜蓿较种植小麦更有利于疏松土壤、改良土壤结构;啤特果树-紫花苜蓿复合系统的不同土壤层土壤含水量均大于啤特果树-小麦复合系统的土壤含水量,说明林下紫花苜蓿比小麦的保水蓄水能力强;紫花苜蓿和小麦的茎叶持水率分别为37.3%和25.8%,说明林下紫花苜蓿更能减少地表径流,从而减轻水土流失;紫花苜蓿}E小麦更能有效地缓解地面温度的激增和激减;种植紫花苜蓿比种粮食作物多收入8900~8850元/hm^2。因此林下种植紫花苜蓿较种植小麦具有显著的生态效益和经济效益。The objective of this research was to compare the ecologic and economic benefit of Pi Te apple (Pyrus ussuriensis) -- alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) -- alfalfa complex ecosystem in Linxia, Gansu Province. Soil bulk density was 1.39 and 1.45 g/cm^3 , non-capillary porosity was 4.72% and 4.15%, and overall porosity was 58.96% and 50.80%, respectively. Soil holding water capacity in the first ecosystem was higher than that in the second. Water-holding rate in leaves-stems of alfalfa and wheat was 37.3% and 25.8%. Income in the first ecosystem was more than the second. These indicate M. alfalfa are more beneficial to the soil conservation and economic development than wheat in the apple ecosystems.
关 键 词:复合农林业 啤特果树-紫花苜蓿复合系统 生态学效应 经济效益
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158