检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学附属第一人民医院康复科,上海市200080
出 处:《中国动脉硬化杂志》2009年第12期1033-1034,共2页Chinese Journal of Arteriosclerosis
摘 要:目的观察反搏治疗组与未反搏治疗组颈动脉血管内斑块形成及血管壁损伤的变化。方法体外反搏治疗组165例,反搏治疗时间1-9年;未反搏治疗组68例,采用彩色超声波检测颈动脉血管壁损伤状态。结果反搏治疗组血管壁损伤异常率占15.2%,斑块形成占11.5%;未反搏治疗组血管损伤异常率占63.2%,斑块形成占51.5%;两组存在明显差异(P〈0.01)。结论体外反搏治疗可以降低血管壁损伤发病率,预防斑块形成。Aim To observe the changes in carotid arteriosclerosis plaque formation and injury between External Counterpulsation(ECP) group and no ECP group.Methods 165 patients(1-9 years) in treatment group by ECP and 68 patients without treatment were checked in carotid arteries with echo Doppler examination.Results Vessel wall injury in ECP group was 15.2% and carotid arteriosclerosis plaque formation was 11.5%.Vessel wall injury in no ECP group was 63.2% and carotid arteriosclerosis plaque formation was 51.5%.There were significant difference between the two groups(P0.01).Conclusion ECP can reduce the incidence of vessel wall injury,preventing plaque formation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31