刑法“不利”解释之反思  

Reflection on Adverse Interpretation in Criminal Law

作　　者：董邦俊[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《法学论坛》2010年第1期124-129,共6页Legal Forum

基　　金：江西省社科规划项目<刑事一体化视野下的权益平衡研究>(07FX208)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：人权保障是刑法学中一个极为重要的问题,刑法的社会秩序维护和人权保障功能是辩证统一的。在刑法中是否应当引入不利解释以促进人权保障值得探讨。不利解释的起源、价值、适用范围有自己的特点,不利解释原则与刑法的价值相偏离,与刑法存疑时有利于被告原则以及国民可预测性存在差异,不利解释在刑法中的适用具有非正当性、非必要性。因此,不宜采纳。Human rights protection is a very important problem in modem criminal law. The function of maintaining social order and human rights protection in criminal law is a dialectical unity. On the basis of the protection of human rights, some scholars put forward the principle of adverse interpretation. The thesis discusses the origins, values, the scope, points out that the principle of criminal law is against the value of the criminal law, and the principle in favor of the defendant when doubts exist and the peoples predictability. So the principle of adverse interpretation of the Criminal Code is unreasonable, unnecessary and should not be adopted in criminal practice.

关 键 词：人权保障 不利解释 刑法目的 价值 原则 差异 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]