检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学中国现代文学研究中心,南京210093 [2]海南师范大学文学院,海口571158
出 处:《德州学院学报》2010年第1期41-45,共5页Journal of Dezhou University
摘 要:中国大陆从事当代文学批评的学者本应该获得从逻辑上讲是可以获得,从道义上讲是理应获得的更多话语权,部分当代文学批评话语权正掌握在国外的汉学家及华裔文学评论家手中。以文学奖、文学批评和学术著作出版为例,分析当代文学批评话语权分布现状及其形成的诸多原因,提出大陆学者重获文学批评话语权的一些建议。Chinese mainland scholars engaged in contemporary literary criticism are supposed to get more discourse authority logically and normally. Foreign and some Chinese originated sinologists are grasping part of discourse authority concerning contemporary literary criticism. In the way of literature prizes, literary criticism and the publication of academic works, this essay analyses the present distribution situation and its forming reasons of discourse authority on contemporary literary criticism. At the same time, it puts forward some suggestions on regaining discourse authority of literary criticism for scholars in Chinese mainland.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.163.238