检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐萌[1]
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学法学院
出 处:《财经科学》2010年第3期23-29,共7页Finance & Economics
基 金:上海财经大学研究生科研创新项目基金;项目编号:CXJJ-2009-303
摘 要:通过对现行金融监管者问责规范性文件的梳理,可以透视出我国金融监管者问责制度存在法律缺失、规则不周等问题。造成这些问题的原因包括问责理念存在缺陷、金融监管制度设计不科学、法律机制选择中缺乏公众参与机制。为此,我们必须重新审视金融监管者问责的理念,着重完善以立法机关、行政机关、司法机关、其他利害关系方及国际金融组织和同行为问责主体的问责制度。The problems of legal deficiencies and imperfect principles existing in the legal system for regulators' accounting have come out through sorting some normative documents on financial accounting rules. The reasons for these problems could be listed in the following: the deficient accotmtability concept, unscientific financial supervision mechanism and the lack of public participation in the legal mechanism selection. Themfore, re - examining the concept of accountability of financial regulators, improving the main the main system of accountability based on perfecting the legislature, the ruling party, the executive, the judiciary, other stakeholders and international financial organizations and behavior have been become inevitable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117