检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘超[1]
出 处:《重庆社会科学》2010年第2期70-74,共5页Chongqing Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"环境友好型社会中的环境侵权救济机制研究"(批准号:06&ZD034)
摘 要:法经济学理论对传统侵权法理论和制度的冲击和影响主要表现在对侵权行为的认定、侵权责任的追究、归责原则的标准和侵权损害赔偿的量化分析等方面。从法经济学理论角度研究对侵权法所造成的冲击和影响的领域和具体内容进一步深化,为重新认识和改进环境侵权救济的理论和制度设计提供了借鉴:完善立法实现环境权的法定化体系是认定环境侵权的前置性要求,环境侵权救济是要实现负外部性行为的内部化,而这一过程不能忽视公权力环境管制的作用,环境侵权损害赔偿中要注重量化标准以增强其社会绩效。Law and economics theory impact traditional legal theory and System, they are mainly manifested in the following aspects: Flow to identify violations, how to he held tort liability, how to determine the standard of imputa- tion Principles, how to analyze environmental tort damages. We need a better understanding of this impact, this gives us a fresh understanding and improvement of the theory and system of environmental tort remedies theory and institutions. The improvement of environmental rights legislation is the premise to identify environmental tort. Envi- ronmental tort remedies is to achieve the internalization of negative external behavior, in this process, we can not ig- nore the public authority's role in environmental regulation. In order to enhance their social performance, we should pay attention to the use of quantitative criteria of the compensation for environmental damage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222