检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]开滦股份吕家坨矿业分公司,河北唐山063107 [2]河北理工大学资源与环境学院,河北唐山063009 [3]河北理工大学人文法律学院,河北唐山063009
出 处:《能源技术与管理》2010年第1期52-54,共3页Energy Technology and Management
基 金:河北省科技支撑计划项目(09275617);唐山市重点实验室项目(06360301-6)
摘 要:目前用于矿井火灾评价的方法仅限于检查表法,依据专家给定分值确定矿井火灾危险程度,其评价结果带有很强的主观性,评价指标体系也不完善。通过对近两年35起典型火灾事故的统计分析,总结了诱发矿井火灾的7个主要因素:煤层自燃等级、井下工人素质、矿井通风管理、消防洒水系统、安全管理、矿井可燃物和机电设备失爆率。依据层次分析法确定各因素的权重,然后经过数据处理评定矿井火灾安全等级,并根据结果对矿井火灾事故防治提出合理的对策和建议。Recently the check-up table is the mere method applying for the assessment of the fire hazard, and the assessment conclusion is subjective intensively and the Index System of the Safety Assessment is not perfect, because the dangerous degree of fire hazard is set up by the professional. In this paper, the seven factors were generalized through the statistic and analysis of the 35 fire hazards, which included self-ignite gradation of coal bed, miner stuff, management of ventilation of coal pits, fire control system, safety administration, mine combustible, risk ratio of the electrical equipment. The ratio of each factor was confirmed by the method of layered analysis, the safety degree was set up through data processing and the proper measure and suggestion were put forward according to the safety result.
分 类 号:TD79[矿业工程—矿井通风与安全]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28