检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马春晓[1]
出 处:《长江师范学院学报》2010年第1期80-85,共6页Journal of Yangtze Normal University
摘 要:宽严相济的刑事政策是基于对犯罪的科学认识,是充分认识到刑法的功能,是对构建和谐社会伟大政治理念的呼应,这三个方面都是与权利恢复制度相一致的。本文对弊大于利的前科制度提出合理性质疑,在宽严相济的语境下对引入权利恢复制度进行正当性、可行性和紧迫性的思考,并对宽严相济刑事政策下我国具体适用权利恢复制度进行"度"的考量。The criminal policy of both tolerance and seriousness is established on the scientific understanding of the functions of criminal law and is corresponding to the great political idea of constructing a harmonious society. These three aspects are in consistent with the system of right restoration. The writer of this article expresses his doubt about the rationality of criminal record institution, reflects on the appropriateness, feasibility and urgency of introducing the system of right restoration in the context of both tolerance and severity, and evaluates the "degree" of the restoration in the specific situation of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42