检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《财经研究》2010年第1期134-143,共10页Journal of Finance and Economics
基 金:福建省社会科学规划项目(2007B065);教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(07JA790096)
摘 要:证券市场监管究竟是有效的还是无效的,在理论上存在着长期争论。目前,证券市场监管的有效性只能通过实证的方法加以甄别。文章将监管股市的政策手段分为经济手段、法律手段、舆论手段和行政手段,并采用事件研究法对股价异常波动点对应的四种监管股市的政策事件产生的市场反应进行研究。研究结果表明:股价异常波动点的分布与监管政策事件存在着明显的对应关系,监管政策事件对中国股票市场波动的影响较大;近年来证券市场监管的力度在加强,监管的效率逐渐提高;相对于其他监管手段而言,经济手段的监管效率较高。In academia, there is some doubt about the efficiency of the supervision over stock markets. Currently, the efficiency of the supervision over stock markets can only be distinguished by empirical methods. The paper divides the policy tools about the supervision over stock markets into economic measures, legal ones, mass media ones and administrative ones, and studies the market reaction of the abnormal volatility point of stock prices to the appearance of the four policy issues aforementioned through the eventstudy analysis. The results show that there is an obvious corresponding relation between the points of abnormal volatility and the supervision policies on stock markets, and the supervision policies on stock markets have comparatively significant effects on the volatility of stock prices. In recent years, the supervision over stock markets is enhanced and its efficiency is gradually improved. Comparative to other measures, the supervision efficiency of economic measures is more efficient.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117