检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷海录[1] 周毅[1] 付京[1] 于颖[1] 雷莹[1] 张鹏[1] 延伟[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军第四五一医院肝胆外科,陕西西安710054
出 处:《中国普通外科杂志》2010年第2期124-127,共4页China Journal of General Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨内镜下乳头括约肌切开术(EST)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)和腹腔镜胆囊切除胆总管探查取石术(LCHTD)治疗胆囊并胆总管结石的效果。方法回顾性分析胆囊并胆总管结石分别采用EST联合LC(468例)和LCHTD(268例)治疗患者的临床资料,对结石清除率、并发症发生率、中转开腹率和住院天数等指标进行比较。结果EST+LC组和LCHTD组在结石清除率(97.2%vs.97.4%)差异上无统计学意义(P>0.05),但LCHTD组比EST+LC组并发症发生率低(1.5%vs.6.4%)(P<0.01),住院时间短(10dvs.15d)(P<0.01),中转开腹率高(6.7%vs.5.2%)(P<0.05)。LCHTD组的远期疗效(96.6%)明显优于EST+LC组(90.6%)(P<0.01)。结论EST联合LC操作技术要求低,LCHTD操作难度大;LCHTD远期疗效优于EST联合LC。应根据具体情况采取个体化的治疗方法。Objective To compare the effect of combined endoscopic sphincterotomy ( EST ) and laparoseopic cholecystectomy (LC) with combined laparoscopic choledocholithotomy-T-tube drainage (LCHTD) and LC for the treatment of eholecystolithiasis and choledochothiasis. Methods We retrospectively analyed the clinical data of patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis treated by EST combined with LC (468 cases ) , and by LCHTD combined with LC (268 cases ). The stone-clearance rates, complication rate, conversion rate of open operation and hospital length of stay in the two groups were compared. Results The stone-clearance rate was 97. 2% (455/468) in the EST + LC group compared with 97. 4% (261/268) in the LCHTD + LC group, and difference was no statistical ( P 〉 0.05 ). But the complication rate was 6.4% in the EST + LC group compared with 1. 5% in the LCHTD + LC group, and difference was obvious (P〈0.01). Hospital length of stay was a median of 15 days in the EST + LC group,and 10 days in the LCHTD + LC group. The long-term effect of LCHTD + LC group ( 96.6% ) was better than that of EST + LC group ( 90.6 % ) ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions EST combined with LC is technically easier, however LCHTD is much harder to handle, but the effect of LCHTD combined with LC is superior to that of EST with LC. For patients with eholecystolithiasis and choledoehliothiasis, the treatment method of choice must be individualized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.131.159