检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院中医科,乌鲁木齐830001 [2]新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院理疗科
出 处:《中华全科医师杂志》2010年第3期214-215,共2页Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
摘 要:采用随机对照研究方法,观察电针治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效。治疗组45例采用电针疗法,对照组45例采用理疗方法(超短波、温热式低周波),观察2组临床疗效及颈椎病临床评价积分。治疗组总有效率93%(42例),对照组总有效率84%(38例),两组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);但在愈显率(痊愈率和显效率)及颈椎病临床评价积分方面,2组治疗前后差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01),说明电针治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效优于理疗。To evaluate the therapeutic effects of electroacupuncture in treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Ninety CSR patients were randomly divided into two groups with 45 in each: in treatment group patients received eleetroacupuneture; in control group patients were treated with physical therapy ( ultrashort wave and hot style low frequency wave). The therapeutic effects and the changes of clinical assessment scale for cervical spondylosis (CASCS) score were observed between two groups. After treatment, the overall effective rates were 93% in treatment group and 84% in control group (P 〉 0. 05 ) ; however the rate of marked improvement and the CASCS score were higher in treatment group than those in control group (P 〈 0. 01 ). Electroacupuncture has a more favorite therapeutic effect than physical therapy for CSR.
分 类 号:R246[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28