定量风险评价(QRA)中的危险辨识方法  

Method of hazards identification in quantitative risk assessment

作　　者：罗艾民[1] 陈平[2] 多英全[1] 吴宗之[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国安全生产科学研究院,北京100029 [2]北京科技大学机械工程学院,北京100083

出　　处：《中国安全生产科学技术》2010年第1期54-57,共4页Journal of Safety Science and Technology

基　　金：国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(编号:2006BAK01B02)资助

摘　　要：危险辨识是进行定量风险评价(QRA)的关键步骤,QRA分析区域内的危险设备设施可能很多,但并不是每台设备设施都一定要包含并进行定量风险计算,这不仅涉及到QRA的效率和成本问题,也涉及到评价结论准确性、安全投入有效性等问题。本文简要介绍并比较了欧盟ARAMIS和挪威Purple book中推介的2种危险辨识方法,有助于国内QRA分析人员参照比较及提升QRA分析的一致性。Hazards identification, or selection of relevant hazardous equipment, is a critical step in Quantitative Risk Assessment （QRA）. If too many equipment are selected, the analysis will be unnecessarily time-consuming. On the contrary, if too few equipment are selected, the risk could be under-estimated. ARAMIS method and Purple book method were introduced and compared, which were two tools and choices for industry and regulators who have not yet settled their detailed policies.

关 键 词：定量风险评价 危险辨识 设备选择 

分 类 号：X937[环境科学与工程—安全科学]