侵权责任法自助行为刍议  

Discussion of Self-help Behavior in Tort Law

作　　者：沃耘[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学法学院 [2]天津商业大学法学院

出　　处：《天津师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第2期44-48,共5页Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(08BFX021);天津市教委项目(20072719)

摘　　要：在我国《侵权责任法》独立于债法的立法背景下,建立完整的自助行为制度更有助于侵权责任法补救、制裁与预防三大功能的全面实现。自助行为可以弥补《侵权责任法》补救功能的负面效应,并在一定程度上确保该法惩罚功能的有限性实现。但我们对最新颁布的《侵权责任法》关于自助行为制度的缺失感到遗憾。我国未来的《民法典》与现行的《侵权责任法》应采取一般化与类型化相结合的立法模式,构建完善的民事自助法律制度。China＇s ＂Tort Liability Law＂ is independent of Debt Law, and the functionality of ＂Tort Liability Law＂ include remedy, sanction and prevention. In this legislative context, a complete system of self-help behavior is more conducive to the full realization of the functionality. Self-help behavior can compensate for negative side effects of remedy. At the same time, self-help behavior can ensure the limited nature of sanction in a certain extent. The latest promulgated ＂Tort Liability Act＂ is defective without the system of self-help behavior. China＇s future ＂Civil Code＂ and the current ＂Tort Liability Act＂ should be inclined to draw on the reasonable factors in the civil law and common law, which are related to the system. Both typet and generalized legislative model shuld be taken, in order to build well-functioned civil self-help legal system.

关 键 词：侵权责任 自助行为 救济功能 类型化 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学] D922.16[政治法律—法学]