检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翁博[1]
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第2期135-140,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(05JZDH0019)
摘 要:日益成为全球政府治理主导范式的准市场模式在中国遭遇了溃败,正承受着批评、质疑甚至否定。立足于对我国多个领域民营化改革实践的分析,并结合相关理论提出和论证的核心命题是:我国民营化实践中出现的矛盾和问题不能简单归咎于准市场模式本身,症结在于转型时期政府责任的严重缺失。主要表现为:财政投入严重不足,缺乏必要的监管和调控,未能进行有效的管理并充当精明买主。当政府责任回归之后,我国准市场模式新的变革时代将重新来临。Quasimarket failed in China and it is being critized, inquired even denied, though it is regarded increasingly as a global role model for governance in many countries. Based on the analysis made to the privatization practice as an important aspect of reform in China and combining its results with correlative theories, however, a conclusion is drawn that the contradictions and problems found or caused in privatization practice should not simply be ascribed to the quasimarket itself but mainly to the serious irresponsibility of government in the restructuring period, such as highly insufficient financial support, lack of necessary supervision/regulation with inefficient management especially no astute "buyer" as a role the government should play in quasimarket. In China the quasimarket will be successful in her reform process only if the government retakes its inevitable responsibility for the expenses and administration required for public advantages and socialized services.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70