检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东海洋大学,广东湛江524088
出 处:《广州化工》2010年第3期93-95,共3页GuangZhou Chemical Industry
摘 要:目的比较不同方法提取高良姜挥发油的效果,为高良姜挥发油化学成分分析提供参考依据。方法采用水蒸气蒸馏法、溶剂提取法和超声波辅助提取法提取高良姜挥发油,用气一质谱联用仪(GC/MS)对高良姜挥发油成分进行鉴定,采用峰面积归一化法确定各成分的相对含量。结果不同方法提取的挥发油外观性状和产率不同,其挥发油样品的峰的数目也有明显差别。结论水蒸气蒸馏法存在不足之处,索式回流提取和超声波辅助提取可作为有效的补充方法。Comparing the different methods of the effect of extracting volatile oil in Alpinia officinarum Hance, data for research of A. officinarum Hance was proposed. The volatile oil of A. officinarum Hance was extracted by vapor distillation, extraction and ultrasonic extraction. Afterwards, the samples were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC -MS). The colors and yields of volatile oil of A. officinarum Hance extracted by different methods were diverse. The number of GC peaks and "apparent abundance" of main components peaks of samples were diverse too, which were dissolved with different degree separately. Difference was found in the kinds and relative content of components of volatile oil extracted by different methods. The method of vapor distillation existed shortcomings, soxhlet reflux extraction and ultrasonic - assisted extraction could be used as an effective supplementary method.
分 类 号:TS255.7[轻工技术与工程—农产品加工及贮藏工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3