不同尿液引流方法的尿液检查分析及护理  

作　　者：甘祥芝[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科,重庆400016

出　　处：《中外医疗》2010年第8期28-29,共2页China & Foreign Medical Treatment

摘　　要：目的分析应用不同尿液引流方法引起菌尿的机率。方法对①留置导尿管持续引流组30例、②留置尿管膀胱冲洗组30例、③膀胱造瘘管持续引流组30例、④膀胱造瘘管膀胱冲洗组30例的患者尿液在即时、2d、5d、7d、10d、14d进行取尿样后进行细菌培养。结果①组与②组,③组与④组相比较,无明显差异(P>0.05),无统计学意义(①+②)组和(③+④)组比较,(P<0.05),有显著差异,后者比前者效果明显。结论留置引流管应用膀胱冲洗法不能明显降低菌尿的发生,膀胱造瘘管比留置导尿管效果好,菌尿发生率低。合理的护理可有效降低菌尿的发生。Objective To analyze the application of different methods of urine drainage caused by bacteriuria cancer. Methods（1） continuous drainage catheter 30 cases, （2）indwelling catheter group of 30 eases of bladder irrigation, （3）continuous drainage of bladder fistula 30 cases, （4）bladder fistula bladder irrigation group of 30 cases of patients with urine in real--time, 2 days, 5 days, 7 days, 10 days, 14days to take urine samples after bacterial culture. Results （1）（2）group and group, （3）（4）group compared with the group, no significant difference （P〉0.05）, no statistical significance（ （1） ＋ （2））group and（（3） ＋ （4） ）group, （P〈0.05）, there are significant differences in the latter than the former evident result. Conclusion Application of drainage tube indwelling bladder washing can significantly reduce the incidence of baeteriuria, bladder fistula indwelling catheter than good effect, a lower incidence of bacteriuria. Reasonable care can effectively reduce the incidence of bacteriuria.

关 键 词：留置导尿管 膀胱造瘘管 菌尿 

分 类 号：R472.92[医药卫生—护理学]