新公平与效率观:消费社会下中国消费政策变革的选择  

New Concept of Fairness and Efficiency:The Choice of Chinese Consumption Policy Change in the Consumer Society

作　　者：郑红娥[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国农业大学社会学系,北京100194

出　　处：《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第2期112-117,共6页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(06CSH012)

摘　　要：公平与效率关系一向被认为是一个此消彼长的悖论。通过引入效率与公平的可能性曲线,就会发现在一定的生产力水平下,社会资源在配置公共消费物品(体现公平原则)和私人消费物品(体现效率原则)的分配时相交的一点无疑是处理公平与效率关系的最佳点。由于目前公共消费政策双轨制的存在(福利原则和市场原则并存),导致在公共消费上出现阶层分化,一些群体基本的生存和发展权利无法保障,而在私人消费政策上也相应出现消费者权利侵犯公民权利的现象。未来消费政策的变革应该在划分公共消费品的性质和提供主体的前提下,在确保满足每个社会成员基本(甚至不断增长)的生存和发展需要的基础上满足个体个性化发展的需要。The relationship between fairness and efficiency has always been considered to be a counter-balance paradox. By introducing the possibility curve of efficiency and equity, we can find that at a certain level of productivity, the intersection point of social resources in the allocation of public consumption goods （embodying the principle of fairness） and private consumption goods （embodying the principle of efficiency） is undoubtedly the best point to deal with the relationship between fairness and efficiency. The existence of the current two-track policy of the public consumption （co-existence of welfare principle and market principle） has resulted in the class division in public consumption： the basic survival and development of some groups cannot be guaranteed while in private consumption policy, there is the phenomenon that corresponding rights violate the civil rights. Changes in the future consumer policy should be made under the premise of delineating the nature of public goods and providing the principal, and meet the individual development needs on the basis of ensuring that each member of society can meet the basic （or even growing） survival and development needs.

关 键 词：消费政策 公共消费 私人消费 公平 效率 

分 类 号：F124.7[经济管理—世界经济]