检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘宾[1] 汤汉文 魏华琳[1] 董红军 吴希阳[1]
机构地区:[1]暨南大学理工学院食品科学与工程系,广州510632 [2]珠海经济特区海泰生物制药有限公司,广东珠海519620
出 处:《临床检验杂志》2010年第2期137-139,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(NO20677023);教育部科学技术研究重点项目(NO207142)
摘 要:目的对链霉亲合素(streptavidin,SA)预包被酶联反应板的优化方法进行研究,比较干法、湿法包被的优越性。方法通过对包被缓冲液、SA浓度、17种市售反应板的比较试验,得出SA包被的较优条件。结果选择洁特高亲和力板,采用碳酸缓冲液干法包被,37℃温育16 h至全干,达最佳包被效果,此时SA浓度为2μg/ml。干法包被的孔间差2.95%,批间差7.37%,37℃保存7 d结合生物素的效果无显著改变。生物素结合量为每孔1 ng,是国产SA预包被反应板的5倍。结论用干法预包被SA优于传统的湿法包被,效果等同甚至超过现有进口SA预包被板。Objective This study aimed to determine optimal coating conditions for streptavidin (SA) immobilization onto microtitration plate by means of comparing the advantages of dry-coating and wet-coating. Methods Various concentrations of SA in different coating buffers and 17 different brands of commercially available microtitration plates were tested by dry-coating and wet-coating methods respectively. The coating stabilities and coating-related variations were analyzed. Results The optimal dry-coating protocol was that Jiete high-binding plate was coated with 100 μl of 2 μg/ml SA in 0.05 mol/L carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at 37 ℃ for 16 h until the buffer was evaporated. The coefficients of well and batch variation were 2.95% and 7.37% respectively. The biotin-binding value was 1 ng per weft, which was as 5 times as that in domestic microtitration plates. Moreover, the coating efficiency kept stable after incubated at 37 ℃ for 7 days. Conclusions The SA dry-coating method developed in the study was proved to be more efficient than the conventional wet-coating. The quality of the SA coated microtitration plates was as good as or even better than the imported plates.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28