检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕立江[1] 袁相龙[1] 应晓明[1] 宋鸿权[2] 陈伟仁[2] 罗华送[3] 汪芳俊[4] 郑如云[5] 何飞军[3] 吴梦晗[4]
机构地区:[1]浙江中医药大学附属第三医院,浙江杭州310009 [2]浙江省中医院,浙江杭州310006 [3]浙江省杭州市中医院,浙江杭州310007 [4]浙江省杭州市红十字会医院,浙江杭州310003 [5]浙江省杭州市下城区中医院,浙江杭州310004
出 处:《中医正骨》2010年第3期14-16,共3页The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology
基 金:浙江省中医药科技计划项目(编号:2007SA007)
摘 要:目的:比较杠杆定位正骨手法与平面用力推拿手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法:将367例腰椎间盘突出症患者按随机数字表法分为2组,Ⅰ组182例,采用杠杆定位正骨手法治疗;Ⅱ组185例,采用一般平面用力推拿手法治疗。治疗1个疗程后观察比较两组的疗效。结果:Ⅰ组膨出型、突出型、游离型患者疗效均优于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:杠杆定位正骨手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效优于平面用力推拿手法,值得临床推广应用。Objective:To compare the curative effects of treatment on lumbar disc herniation (LDH) between bone setting manipulation of lever positioning and plane forcefully massage manipulation. Methods: 367 patients with lumbar disc herniation were randomly divided into 2 groups by using random number table method. 182 cases in group I were administrated with bone setting manipulation of lever positioning,while the others in group II were administrated with ordinary manipulation of plane forcefully massage. The clinical effects of the 2 groups were observed after a period of treatment. Results: The curative effects of treatment on LDH of bulging type, protruding type and freedom type in group I were better than that in group II. There was statistical difference between the 2 groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: The bonesetting manipulation of lever positioning performs better on the treatment of lumbar disc herniation compared with plane forcefully massage manipulation, and it is worth popularizing in clinic.
分 类 号:R244.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.204