检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2010年第2期5-10,共6页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
基 金:国家社科“秘密侦查的法律规制研究”的资助(09BFX076);广东省哲学社会科学规划课题(07YG01).
摘 要:现行的司法鉴定制度从整体上可以归纳为"中立性保障模式",该模式主要特点是注重鉴定人的中立性保障,忽视鉴定结论的科学性审查。该模式对保障鉴定结论的客观性和公正性都存在不足。我国应当进行制度重点建设的转换,即从中立性保障转换为鉴定结论的科学性保障,主要应从强化当事人的鉴定启动权、强化鉴定结论质证程序、建立科学性审查标准以及建立专家辅助人等几个方面着手。同时,还要注意处理好科学性保障与鉴定人客观义务的关系、鉴定结论与其他证据的关系以及当事人权利保障与诉讼效率的关系等等。The existing system of judicial appraisal as a whole can be described as "a neutrality guarantee model". The main characteristics of the model focus on assuring the neutrality of experts, whereas the scientific review of appraisal conclusions is ignored. Such a model has defects in guaranteeing objectiveness and impartiality of appraisal conclusions. China should transform the focus of the system, that is, to change from the guarantee of neutrality to guarantee of scientific conclusions, by granting the initiation right to the parties concerned, enhancing the cross-examination procedure of appraisal conclusions, establishing scientific review standards and professional support. At the same time, we should pay attention to coordinating the relationship between the guarantee of scientific nature and obligation of appraisers, between appraisal conclusions and other evidence, as well as between protecting the fights of the parties and effectiveness of proceedings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.60