应对突发冲击的宏观调控研究的新动态  

Recent Researches on Public Emergency Responses

作　　者：唐文进[1] 周文[1] 吴晓兰[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学新华金融保险学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《财经理论与实践》2010年第2期2-6,共5页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(08AJL006);中南财经政法大学研究生创新教育计划资助项目(2009BJJ48)

摘　　要：近年来应对突发冲击宏观调控的研究成果主要集中于以下三个基本问题:直接调控与间接调控之间的权衡;静态预案与动态应对之间的权衡;应对手段的选择。更多学者对直接宏观调控持有怀疑态度,而对间接宏观调控则呼声更高。静态预案反应迅速但缺乏弹性;动态应对反应灵活但决策难度大。冲击本身的发展变异以及冲击的环境变量对应对方式的选择有重要影响。In this paper, we have reviewed the relative research findings about public emergency responses during the last decade. We have found that there are three fundamental questions in the field. The first one is the governments＂ balancing between direct policy instruments and indirect ones; the second one is the governments＂ balancing between the static responding plan and dynamic responding plan; thirdly, what measures should be chosen appropriately to cope with public emergencies. More scholars are suspicious of direct ones and appeal for indirect policy instruments. Static plans can achieve fast responses however they are inelastic; In contrast, responding to public emergencies dynamically can be more agile, but it is more difficult for the authorities to make decisions. The development variable and environment variable have significant influence on the choices of responding measures.

关 键 词：突发冲击 直接调控 间接调控 静态预案 动态应对 

分 类 号：F20[经济管理—国民经济]