检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙红旗[1]
机构地区:[1]徐州师范大学亚非研究所,江苏徐州221116
出 处:《徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第2期102-106,共5页Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金后期资助项目<土地问题与南非政治经济>成果之一;项目批准号07FSS001
摘 要:自从17世纪中期荷兰殖民者到达开普后,东印度公司的雇员,即布尔人就处于不断的土地扩张中。究其原因,我们不能按照殖民主义的一般逻辑来解释,因为布尔人已经成为本土化了的殖民者,在其向南非内地"迁徙"的过程中,他们与原住民都受到南非自然条件的制约而主要从事牧业经济,但在生产关系亦即土地占有和传承方式方面却存在着较大差异,由此导致在两个半世纪之内,科伊桑人和班图黑人87%的土地被白人占有,他们自身则沦为白人的奴仆。Since Holland colonists arrived at Cape in 1652, the members of the East Indian Company, Boers, had been in the process of colonizing South Africa. The cause should not be explained according to the common logic of colonialism, as Boers had already become naturalized colonists. The herdsmen of the South Africa grassland, the native and white people had great differ- ence between the mode of their land possession and succession, which pushed the Boers further into the hinterland. As a result of the conflict, the Khoisan and Bantu Negro lost most of their homelands and thereafter became the slaves of the Boers in two and a half centuries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166