检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学第一医院肾内科,北京100034 [2]北京大学人民医院肾内科,北京100044
出 处:《中国实用内科杂志》2010年第3期220-222,226,共4页Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine
基 金:卫生部临床学科重点项目(20010913)
摘 要:目的观察支架治疗对狭窄程度50%~70%的无症状动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄(ARAS)患者在血压及肾功能方面的影响。方法将2003年9月至2008年5月北京大学第一医院66例无症状ARAS患者分为支架组与药物组各33例。比较两组血压、降压药物剂量(DDD)及肾功能,并比较两组血压与肾功能获益率。结果平均随访(19±7)个月(12~36个月),(1)血压:药物组无论血压或服用降压药物剂量均无明显下降,支架组术后所需的降压药物剂量明显下降[(0.97±0.88)DDD对(1.31±0.72)DDD,P<0.05];收缩压明显下降[(132±12)mmHg对(140±20)mmHg,P<0.05)]。随访12个月时,支架组所需的降压药物剂量明显少于药物组[(1.08±0.76)DDD对(1.79±0.75)DDD,P<0.01],血压获益率明显高于药物组(58.1%对9.4%,P<0.01)。(2)肾功能:随访期间,药物组肾功能下降[(63.2±14.0)mL/(min.1.73m2)对(70.4±16.4)mL/(min.1.73m2),P<0.01)],而支架组肾功能稳定。12个月时两组在eGFR与肾功能获益率方面差异无统计学意义[(64.6±15.8)mL/(min.1.73m2)对(63.2±14.0)mL/(min.1.73m2),P>0.05;81.8%对72.7%,P>0.05)]。结论对于狭窄程度50%~70%的无症状ARAS患者,支架治疗使所需降压药物剂量减少,血压易于控制,延缓肾功能下降。Objective To study the effect of medical therapy and renal angioplasty on blood pressure and renal function in asymptomatic ARAS patietnts with stenosis between 50% - 70%. Methods Sixty-six asymptomatic ARAS patients with unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis ranged from 50% to 70% were divided into renal angioplasty group ( n = 33 ) and medical therapy group ( n = 33 ). Blood pressure, antihypertensive dosage ( defined as daily dosage, DDD) and renal function (Scr, eGFR ) were monitored, and the beneficial effect on the blood pressure( cure or improve) and renal function (improve or stabilize) were also evaluated. Results After the ( 19 ± 7)months(12-36 months) of follow-up,both blood and renal function changed as followed: (1) Blood pressure: Compared to the baseline, neither blood pressure nor antihypertensive dosage changed in medical therapy group, while in angioplasty group, antihypertensive dosage decreased significantly [ (0. 97 ± 0. 88)DDD vs (1.31 ± 0. 72) DDD,P 〈 0. 05 ) ]. ( 2 ) Renal function : Compared to the baseline, eGFR decreased [ ( 63.2 ± 14. 0 ) mL/ ( min · 1.73 m^2 ) vs (70. 4 ± 16. 4) mL/( min · 1.73 m^2 ),P 〈 0. 01 ] in medical therapy group, but did not alter in angioplasty group. At 12 months,no significant difference was observed between the two groups either on eGFR [ ( 64. 6 ± 15. 8 ) mL/( min · 1.73 m^2 ) vs (63.2 ± 14. 0) mL/( min · 1.73 m^2 ),P 〉 0. 05 ] or the beneficial effect on renal function (81.8% vs 72. 7% ,P〉 0.05). Conclusion Renal angioplasty showed a drug-dosage-saving effect on blood pressure and seemed to protect the renal function from deterioration in asymptomatic ARAS patients with stenosis ranged from 50% to 70%. Large-sealed and long-term studies are needed to verify our results.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120