检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜复勇[1] 张延荣[1] 魏经汉[1] 刘明华[1] 蔡新安 邢艳丽
机构地区:[1]河南医科大学第一附属医院心内科
出 处:《起搏与心脏》1990年第3期120-122,共3页
摘 要:分析急性下、后壁心肌梗塞70例患者(并束支阻滞者除外)的心电图结果显示:Ⅱ导联ST段有或无抬高,Ⅲ导联ST段抬高大于1mm,且Ⅲ导联ST段抬高幅度大于Ⅱ导联(即STⅢ/Ⅱ>1)者,在并有右室梗塞的29例中有26例(89.66%);无右室梗塞的41例中有15例(36.66%),二组间ST段抬高Ⅲ/Ⅱ>1检出率有非常显著性差异(P<0.001)。作者认为ST段抬高Ⅲ/Ⅱ>1可作为急性下、后壁心肌梗塞合并右室梗塞的诊断依据之一,其敏感度、特异度分别为89.66%、63.41%。阳性预告值为63.41%。本资料还显示:Ⅱ导联ST段无抬高,仅Ⅲ导联ST段抬高≥1mm对右室梗塞的诊断更具有特异性。ECG of 70 patients with acute inferior/posterior infarction (no bundle branch block) was studied. In 26 patients(89. 66%) with right ventricular infarction (RVI) and in 15 patients (36. 6%) without RVI the ECG showed ST elevation in lead III exceeding that of lead I (ratio III /II>1). The positive rate of ST III/II>1 was significantly different berween the patients with RVI and that without RVI (P< 0. 001). It is concluded that ST elevation in lead III exceeding that of lead II can be one of the bases for a diagnosis of RVI in ECG-diagnosed inferior/posterior infarction. The sensitivety and specificity were 89. 66% and 63. 41% respectively. The positive predictive value was 63. 41%. If ST elevation appears only in lead III (but not in lead II) a highter specificity would be expected.
分 类 号:R542.220.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3