防汛与人身自由——以“强制转移权”设定的合法性分析为例  

Flood Control and Personal Freedom——Taking Legitimacy Analysis of Compulsory Transfer Power for Example

作　　者：陈越峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2010年第1期79-84,共6页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：在防汛措施中,强制转移权的设定涉及人身自由,属于《立法法》规定的法律保留范围内的事项。《浙江省防汛防台防旱条例》对此作出规定,在形式合法性方面存在瑕疵;但是,这一措施的设定具有合目的性、必要性和平衡性,在实质合法性方面合乎比例原则。因此,需要采用修订法律或法律解释的方式整合形式合法性和实质合法性,在包括突发事件应对在内的行政事务中实现一种经由形式法治的实质法治。The institution of compulsory transfer power as a flood control measure concerns personal freedom, which belongs to the scope of legal reservation in Legislation Law. Although the institution of the power in Regulation of Flood, Typhoon and Drought Control of Zhejiang Province is of purposiveness, necessity and balance, as well as legitimacy fitting in with the principle of proportionality virtually, there are flaws in form. Consequently, amendment and interpretation should be taken to combine formal legitimacy with substantial legitimacy in order to achieve both formal and substantial law ruling in coping with administrative affairs, including emergent events.

关 键 词：人身自由 行政强制措施 法律保留原则 比例原则 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] D927[政治法律—法学]