检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]内蒙医学院附属医院老干部科,内蒙古呼和浩特010050 [2]内蒙古自治区医院,内蒙古呼和浩特010017
出 处:《内蒙古医学杂志》2010年第2期179-180,共2页Inner Mongolia Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:对经桡动脉与股动脉途径行冠脉介入诊疗的可行性、安全性及优缺点行对照研究。方法:随机选取进行冠脉造影和介入治疗的患者,股动脉途径78例,桡动脉途径32例,进行临床分析。结果:经桡动脉途径行冠脉造影和介入治疗的患者在术后血管及穿刺部位并发症的发生、躯体不适及心理状态等方面均明显优于经股动脉途径,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:经桡动脉途径行冠脉造影和介入治疗安全可行,值得推广应用。Objective:Feasibility,safety,advantage and disadvantage of the trans-radial and femoral artery via coronary intervention for out-patients was studied.Method: Random select patients which were treated by coronary arteriography and coronary intervention including 78 cases of femoral artery approach and 32 cases of trans-radial approach was being done clinic analysis.Result:Patients of trans-radial approach via coronary arteriography and coronary intervention in complications of vascular and puncture site,somatic discomfort,psychological state and so on were better than femoral artery approach,and the difference was significant(P〈0.01).Conclusion: Patients of trans-radial approach via coronary arteriography and coronary intervention was safe and feasible,and worth of extension and application.
分 类 号:R322.121[医药卫生—人体解剖和组织胚胎学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157