2种诱饵诱蝇结果比较分析研究  

Analysis on the efficacy of two baits against flies

作　　者：靳增军[1] 王志强[1] 王建蕊[1] 王向文[1] 李现亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]邯郸市疾病预防控制中心,河北邯郸056008

出　　处：《中华卫生杀虫药械》2010年第2期125-126,共2页Chinese Journal of Hygienic Insecticides and Equipments

摘　　要：目的分析比较2种诱饵诱蝇的效果。方法笼诱法。结果腐鱼肠饵法监测的蝇种以大头金蝇(34.40%)、丝光绿蝇(26.63%)为主;糖醋饵法以家蝇(32.61%)和厩腐蝇(22.37%)为主,其次为红头丽蝇(17.52%)和丝光绿蝇(16.17%)。2种诱饵诱捕蝇种的季节消长走势基本一致。结论2种诱饵诱捕成蝇的种类有所不同;在捕获成蝇数量上,以腐鱼肠饵的诱蝇效果好于糖醋饵。Objective To carry out two baits in cage trap for monitoring flies population and species in Handan. Methods Cage luring method. Results The results showed that Chrysomya megacephala （34. 40% ） and Lu- cilia sericata （26. 63% ） were attracted to a mixture of putrid fish inners, and Musca domestica （32. 61% ） , Mu^cina stabulans （22. 37% ）, CaUiphora vicina （17.52%） and L. sericata （16. 17% ） were attracted to a measure that compounded by a mixture of brown sugar and vinegar. The flies density of two baits varied with the seasons and had similar seasonal growth and decay trend. Conclusion The species of catching flies with two baits are different. The efficacy of catching flies by fly trap with putrid fish inners is better.

关 键 词：成蝇 腐鱼肠饵法 糖醋饵法 种类 密度 

分 类 号：R184.39[医药卫生—流行病学]