检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]国家安全生产监督管理总局职业安全卫生研究所理化分析室,北京102308
出 处:《中国医药》2010年第4期318-320,共3页China Medicine
基 金:中国煤矿尘肺病治疗基金项目(2008-04)
摘 要:目的观察3种中药方剂分别治疗不同中医辨证分型的尘肺病患者的临床疗效。方法筛选确诊的尘肺患者128例,根据中医辨证施治分为血瘀痰凝组44例,肺燥热组63例和肺脾肾虚寒组21例。其中每组包含治疗组和对照组,且治疗组分别为24、34、12例,对照组分别为20、29、9例。对照组均给予常规治疗,治疗组在常规治疗基础上根据不同分型分别给予1号、2号、3号对应方剂治疗,并观察疗效。结果3组治疗后临床症状观察总有效率分别为91.7%、88.2%和83.3%,与对照组比较,血瘀痰凝组及肺燥热组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);胸片总有效率分别为41.7%、44.1%、50.0%,与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论三种方剂治疗不同尘肺类型的患者,在临床症状和胸片上均有疗效。Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of three kinds of traditional Chinese medicine therapies on pneumoconiosis with "TCM Syndrome Differentiation. Methods Totally 128 definited pneumoconiosis patients were divided into three group. Group A had Blood stasis and accumulation phlegm-typ lung; group B had hot-type lung and group C had cole-type lung by TCM Syndrome Differentiation. Each group also included treatment group and contrl group, and the treatment group were 24, 34, 12 cases, the control group were 20,29,9 cases. The control group was only administrated with routine supportive' treatment, the treatment group was given "1", "2" and "3" prescription respectively based on TCM syndrome differentiation. Results After treatment the total effective rates were 91.7%, 88.2% and 83.3%. Compared with the control group, group A and B differences were statistically significant (P 〈0.05). The effective rates of treatment group of A, B and C were 41.7%, 44.1%, 50.0%. Differences were statistically significant (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Three kinds of prescription which treat various types of pneumoconiosis patients are efficacy on both clinical symptoms and chest X-ray.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249