财政转移支付与义务教育投入:以中部城市为例  

Fiscal Transfer and the Compulsory Education Expenditure:Based on the Cities in Midland of China

作　　者：曾明[1] 李武龙 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学公共管理学系,江西南昌330031 [2]江西现代技师学院招就处,江西南昌330095

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2010年第2期68-73,共6页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：2009年国家社科基金青年项目"地方政府公共支出偏好研究--财政转移支付的视角"(09CZZ030)

摘　　要：通过对2005年中部75个城市的财政与教育截面数据的定量分析,发现转移支付资金有部分被用到了教育中去,但影响系数并不大,同时它使得城市政府减少了本级财政对教育的投入,即转移支付对城市教育经费投入产生了替代效应,但这种挤出效应也不明显。说明城市政府并不会将转移支付资金过多地投入到教育中去,而是会尽量用本级收入来维持基本的教育资金保障。所以,单纯依靠上级财政补助来实现教育的均等化可能是个难以实现的任务,而更需倚重地方政府的自身财政投入。The cross-section analysis on the fiscal and education data of 75 cities in central China in 2005 shows that the fiscal transfer is partly by urban governments used to the education expenditure,but at the same time they reduce the local fiscal revenue＇s contribution,which means the transfer produces a substituting effect,but the impact coefficients of both are not distinctive.The urban governments will not expend more fiscal transfer on compulsory education,but use more of their own revenue to pay the basic need of education.So we think it is a difficult task to achieve equal education level,depending on the fiscal transfer.The alternative approach is to rely much more on the government＇s revenue.

关 键 词：转移支付 教育投入 替代效应 中部城市 

分 类 号：F810.453[经济管理—财政学]