检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柴立龙[1] 马承伟[1] 张义[1] 王明磊[2] 马永良[3] 籍秀红[1]
机构地区:[1]中国农业大学水利与土木工程学院,北京100083 [2]农业部农业机械试验鉴定总站,北京100122 [3]中国农业大学上庄实验站,北京100193
出 处:《农业工程学报》2010年第3期249-254,共6页Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基 金:"十一五"国家科技支撑计划现代高效设施农业工程技术研究与示范课题(2006BAD28B07);资源节约关键技术标准研制课题(2006BAK04A03)
摘 要:为研究地热在温室中应用的可行性,该文在北京地区一栋日光温室中采用地下水式地源热泵系统进行了供暖试验研究。试验结果表明,整个供暖期(2007年10月15日-2008年3月10日)地源热泵系统的供暖性能系数约为3.83,与燃煤热水采暖系统相比,地源热泵系统供暖可节约42%的能源消耗量,具有显著的节能减排效果。温室内单位面积的每日供暖耗电量约为0.15kW·h/(m2·d),供暖费用约为0.12元/(m2·d)。地源热泵供暖、天然气供暖、燃煤热水供暖以及燃油热风供暖几种温室采暖方式的相对运行费用分别约为1.20、1.31、1.00与3.36,地源热泵供暖的运行费用略高于燃煤热水供暖,但低于天然气供暖和燃油热风供暖。In order to study the feasibility of the application of ground source heat pump(GSHP) in greenhouses,experimental research on groundwater-style ground source heat pump system was carried out in greenhouse heating in Beijing. Experimental result showed that the coefficient of the system performance in greenhouse heating had reached 3.83 during the heating period of Oct.15,2007-Mar.10,2008,about 42% energy had been saved compare with conventional coal-fired hot water heating system,which its merits of energy-saving and greenhouse gases mitigating of the system were distinctive. The total electric consumption and the heating cost of the system was 0.15 kW·h/(m^2·d) and 0.12 Yuan/(m^2·d) ,respectively. The comparison among the heating systems of GSHP,natural gas,coal and light diesel oil were made,which the relative heating cost were 1.20,1.31,1.00 and 3.36,respectively,and the heating cost of ground source heat pump was higher than that of coal slightly,but was lower than that of natural gas and light diesel oil apparently.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74