竞技主义到商谈合作:诉讼哲学的演进和转型  

From Sporting Theory to Communication of Cooperation:The Evolution and Transition of the Judicial Philosophy

作　　者：韩德明[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏警官学院,江苏南京210012

出　　处：《法学论坛》2010年第2期73-79,共7页Legal Forum

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目<我国社区矫正制度的模式选择与建构趋向>(07CFX033)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：司法竞技主义是一种诉讼哲学,倡导法官消极裁判、当事人意思自治和通过竞技性举证和质证决定纠纷解决结果。司法竞技主义存在严重的理论缺陷,将纠纷解决方案定格于利益主体之间的对抗和竞技之上,既容易导致实质非正义,也拖延诉讼和增加诉讼成本。因应后现代秩序性质和政治哲学思想的发展,协商性司法作为一种新型诉讼哲学开始在西方国家司法改革实践逐步得到体现。协商性司法主张通过对话、协商、合作等方式解决纠纷。Sporting theory of justice is a kind of judicial philosophy which advocates negative judge,autonomy of party and determination of dispute resolution through competitive proof and cross-examination. There exists serious shortcomings in athletic justice that fix the solutions of disputes in the confrontation and competition among the interests of the main. That will not only lead to injustice in substansly,but also delay the proceedings of litigation and increase the cost of litigation. In response to the development on the nature of post-modern order and political philosophy,deliberative justice as a new type of litigation philosophy begins to be gradually reflected in judicial reform practice in the western countries. Deliberative justice claims to resolve disputes through dialogue,consultation and cooperation.

关 键 词：司法竞技主义 协商性司法 诉讼哲学 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]