检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷宗宝[1] 邓超[1] 王洪武[1] 程亮亮[1]
出 处:《实用临床医学(江西)》2010年第2期8-11,共4页Practical Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的评价胸膜厚度、腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、胸腔积液癌胚抗原/血清癌胚抗原(胸腔积液CEA/血清CEA)比值在恶性与结核性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断中的价值。方法选择经胸腔镜病理组织检查确诊胸腔积液患者91例,按病理结果分为2组,结核性胸膜炎组(结核性组)43例和恶性胸腔积液组(恶性组)48例。对2组患者胸腔积液CEA/血清CEA比值、ADA和CT影像学上表现的胸膜厚度、胸腔积液密度变化进行比较。结果恶性组胸腔积液CEA/血清CEA比值高于结核性组[6.72±6.9 vs 0.82±0.43(t=-3.832,P=0.001),ADA水平低于结核性组(21.9±6.5)vs(50.3±31.9)U/L(t=4.474,P=0.000)];恶性组胸膜厚度>10.0 mm且以弥漫型为主,结核性组胸膜厚度6.0 mm左右且以局限性为主;胸膜厚度、ADA、胸腔积液CEA/血清CEA3项联合检测的灵敏度、特异度、灵敏度/1-特异性(AUC)分别为90.0%、96.0%、0.869,均高于单检和2项联检,且3项联检的特异度与胸腔积液CEA/血清CEA+ADA、胸膜厚度+胸腔积液CEA/血清CEA联检的特异度比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论胸膜厚度、ADA、胸腔积液CEA/血清CEA3项联合检测对鉴别恶性与结核性胸腔积液有较高的临床价值。Ojective To evaluate the diagnostic value of pleural thickness,ADA and the ratio of evaluation of CEA in pleural fluid over that in serum.Methods To collect the levels of ADA,the ratios of the CEA in the pleural fluid and the blood-serum,the thicknesses of PLE and the dens of pleural fluid from the 43 patients with tuberculous pleurisy and the 48 patients with malignant pleural effusion were examined.All the cases were definited by thoracoscope.Results The ratio of CEA(6.72±6.9) in the pleural fluid and serum from the patients with malignant pleural effusion were higher than those(0.82±0.43)from the patients with tuberculous pleurisy(t=-3.832,P=0.001),but the level of ADA(21.9±6.5)U/L in the pleural fluid from the patients with malignant pleural effusion was opposite to those(50.3±31.9)U/L from the patients with tuberculous pleurisy(t=4.474,P=0.000).The pleura thickness(〉10.0 mm) of malignant pleural effusion was the suffusion,but the pleura thickness(about 6.00 mm) of tuberculous pleurisy was local.The sensitivity(90.0%),the specificity(96.0%),AUC(0.869)of the three union-detections were higher than those of mon-detection and union-detections,The sepecificity AUC of the three union-detections were obviously different than those of union-detections of the ratios of the CEA+ADA and the pleura thickness+the ratios of the CEA(P〈0.05).Conclusion The clinic value of the three union-detections should be higher in the differentiating malignant pleural effusion to tuberculous pleural effusion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175