检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]淮南市公安局刑事警察支队,安徽淮南232001 [2]司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所上海市法医学重点实验室,上海200063
出 处:《法医学杂志》2010年第2期116-119,共4页Journal of Forensic Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨急性闭合性颅脑损伤的临床分型与损伤程度鉴定结果的相关性,以提高法医学鉴定结果的准确性,为今后损伤程度鉴定标准的修订提供科学、合理的参考依据。方法选取急性闭合性颅脑损伤的鉴定案件30例,分别做出临床分型与损伤程度鉴定,比较两者结果及相关依据的异同。结果轻型颅脑损伤相当于轻微伤或轻伤,中型颅脑损伤相当于轻伤或重伤,重型或特重型颅脑损伤多相当于重伤。结论急性闭合性颅脑损伤的临床分型与损伤程度鉴定结果有一定的相关性,在修订人体损伤程度鉴定标准时有必要参考临床分型标准,以提高鉴定标准的科学性和合理性。Objective In order to improve accuracy of forensic expert conclusion and provide scientific and reasonable accordance for revising identifying criteria for the injury degree, correlation between clinical classification and injury certification of acute closed head trauma were explored. Methods A total of 30 cases about acute closed head trauma were selected. Comparison and analysis were made about their differences and the correlation between the clinical classification and the injury degree certification. Results Mild craniocerebral injury is equal to mild or moderate injury, moderate craniocerebral injury is equivalent to mild or severe injury, severe cranioeerebral injury is mostly equivalent to severe injury. Conclusion There are some correlation between the clinical classification and the injury certification in acute closed head trauma. It is necessary to refer to the criteria of clinical classification when revising identifying criteria for the injury degree so as to enhance scientific rigor and rationality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28