检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河海大学理学院,南京210098 [2]河海大学水资源环境学院,南京210098
出 处:《工程数学学报》2010年第2期313-320,共8页Chinese Journal of Engineering Mathematics
基 金:河海大学自然科学基金(2084408319)~~
摘 要:近年来,基于绝对分布的马尔可夫链预测(ADMCP)方法、叠加马尔可夫链预测(SPMCP)方法和加权马尔可夫链预测(WMCP)方法在各种水文序列的预测理论中得到了广泛的应用。尽管各种马尔可夫链预测方法在有关应用实例中效果都不错,但是,实际上它们的预测效果是有差别的。本文通过统计试验手段对这三种马尔可夫链预测方法进行了比较研究,结论表明:WMCP方法预测精度最高,SPMCP方法预测精度次之,ADMCP方法预测精度相对来讲最差。In recent years, the weighted Markov chain prediction method (WMCP), the Markov chain prediction method based on absolute distribution (ADMCP) and probability summation (SPMCP) have been widely used in the various hydrology series. Although the application results of various Markov chain prediction methods in real situations are seemed good, the prediction accuracy of these three kinds of Markov chain prediction methods is different. The three prediction methods are studied by using statistical experiment. The experiment results indicate that the prediction accuracy of the WMCP method is the highest, the ADMCP method is the lowest, and the SPMCP method is in the middle.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.250.24