小儿静脉输液拔针不同按压法效果比较  

Comparison of Two Pressing Methods After Venous Infusion of Children

作　　者：曾雪梅[1] 陈丹[1] 张娅[1] 林琼珠[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省汕头市妇幼保健院,汕头市515041

出　　处：《当代护士（中旬刊）》2010年第4期85-86,共2页Modern Nurse

摘　　要：目的探讨静脉输液后拔针按压的最佳方法。方法将本院2008年1月至8月门诊输液的患儿120例,随机分为观察组和对照组,各60例,采用两种不同的拔针按压方法(棉球按压法和传统棉枝按压法),比较2组患儿输液局部按压3～5分钟皮下瘀血的情况以及拔针时患儿的舒适度。结果观察组皮下瘀血的发生率明显低于对照组,舒适度高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(p均<0.01)。结论采用棉球按压法能提高患儿的舒适度,减少并发症,值得推广应用。Objective：To explore the best pressing methods after venous infusion.Methods： 120 Children outpatients were randomly divided into two groups：the observation group （pressing with the conton ball）and the control group （pressing with the conton braneh）.The rate of pain and congestion between the two groups were compared.Results ：The rate of subcutaneous congestion and pain in the observation group were lower than those in the control group （p〈0.01）.Conclusion：Pressing with the conton ball instead of the conton branch could reduce the rate of pain and congestion.

关 键 词：小儿 静脉输液 拔针按压 疼痛 瘀血 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]