检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王方东[1]
出 处:《安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第1期32-36,共5页Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science
摘 要:公民在法律面前人人平等不仅仅是适用法律上的平等,更重要的还是包含在立法上的平等。对公民在法律面前人人平等这一原则的这样理解已成为当今人类社会的共识。然而,我国自新中国建国以来却对这一原则的理解存在认识上的错误,导致在立法上存在很多不平等的规定,随着我国民主与法治的不断进步,随着社会主义市场经济的不断深入,人们要求立法上平等的呼声也越来越高,因此修改或解释宪法,明确平等原则的基本含义;废除《选举法》及其他法律、法规中一切不平等的规定就是顺应时代的潮流的需要,也是构建社会主义和谐社会的需要。That citizens are equal before the law is applicable not only in law, but also in legislation, which has become a consensus of the current society. However, there are errors in the understanding of this principle since the founding of the PRC resulting in many inequalities in legislation. With the constant progress of democracy, the rule of law and the deepening market economy, appeals for legislative equality are increasingly urgent. To modify or interpret the Constitution, clarify the basic connotations of the principle of equality, and repeal The Electoral Law and all the other provisions of inequality are to accord to the trend of the times and the needs of constructing a socialist harmonious society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28