检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北大学信息科学与工程学院,辽宁沈阳110004
出 处:《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》2010年第4期507-510,共4页Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基 金:高等学校科技创新工程重大项目培育资金资助项目(708026)
摘 要:随着CAIDA探测方式由Skitter到Ark的改变,基于2008-02-27~2008-02-29的CAIDAArk项目数据及2007-08-16的CAIDA Skitter项目数据,通过建立网络拓扑和仿真分析单测量点数据与整合数据在平均度、聚类系数、核数等多个特征量上的差异,对比了Skitter和Ark项目在单测量点探测上存在的误差,再对两种探测方式下数据的度分布进行对比.研究结果表明,Ark项目单测量点误差稍小,两组数据在度分布上既存在相同的规律也稍有差异.The change of CAIDA detection mode from Skitter to Ark was investigated,based on the data of Ark project over February 27~29,2008 and that of Skitter project on August 16,2007.Setting up the network topology and analyzing the difference between the data measured from single vantage points and integrated data in several characteristics values,e.g.,the degree of average,clustering coefficient and coreness,the errors of measured data sets from single vantage points in Skitter and Ark projects were compared with each other,as well as the degree distributions of their measured data.The results revealed that the errors of the measured data from single vantage points in Ark project are slightly smaller,and that the two data sets in both projects are basically the same with few discrepancies.
关 键 词:CAIDA(网络数据分析联合组织) IP INTERNET拓扑 单点测量 度 核数
分 类 号:TP393.01[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200