高官问责:制度逻辑与改革模式——基于中国内地与香港的多维比较  

Research on the System Logic and Reform Mode of Senior Officials Accountability——Multi-Angles Comparison between SOAS of China's Mainland and Hong Kong

作　　者：赵蕾[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学公共管理系,上海200444

出　　处：《华南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第1期76-83,共8页Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金(B.37-0104-08-002)

摘　　要：中国内地与香港的高官问责制度,发生于相近的历史时期并有着相似的改革称谓,但就其制度逻辑和构建模式而言,却表现出若干迥然不同的改革思维与演进轨迹。中国内地的高官问责制度是危机应急举措的产物,聚焦于行政责任追究机制的单项推进,以领导干部、尤其是行政首长做为主要问责对象,旨在藉此重塑官场文化、深化干部人事制度改革,在本质上是一场基于本土自创形式的行政体制改革;香港的高官问责制度则是以14位政治任命的主要官员做为问责对象,旨在通过程序化的问责制度的模仿和移植,启动一场政制层面的改革,以此维护公务员的中立原则、平衡政治系统的利益分歧。The Senior Officials Accountability System（SOAS） of China's Mainland and Hong Kong appeared in the close time with the similar titles,while whose system logic and building mode were different entirely.The SOAS of China's Mainland,which is the response of crisis,focuses on the realization of administration accountability of leaders,especially the Corregidor.By its own indigenous mode,China's Mainland governments want to renovate the officialdom culture and advance the reform of leader system.The SOAS of Hong Kong,as the transplant from west minister system,aims at 14 Senior Officials.By this politics system reform,Hong Kong government wants to maintain the neutralism of civil servant and balance the politics benefit.

关 键 词：高官问责制 中国内地 香港 比较研究 

分 类 号：D630.3[政治法律—政治学] D676.58[政治法律—中外政治制度]