检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周建国[1] 钱红兵[1] 周亚平[1] 吕建元[1] 吴天河[1]
出 处:《生物骨科材料与临床研究》2010年第2期43-46,共4页Orthopaedic Biomechanics Materials and Clinical Study
摘 要:目的比较掌指骨骨折不同内固定方法在生物力学方面的差异。方法采用尸体掌指骨人为造成骨折,分别应用微型钢板、贯穿克氏针、交叉克氏针、钢丝固定,比较其在生物力学方面的差异。结论微型钢板固定治疗掌指骨骨折在抗拉伸、抗压缩、抗弯曲、抗扭转方面较其他几种常用内固定方法具有明显的优越性。结论微型钢板与临床上常用的其它几种掌(指)Objective To compare the different fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fracture mechanics methods in the biological differences. Methods The body of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures caused by man, namely, application of micro-plate, through the K-wire, cross Kirschner, wire fixed to compare their biomechanical differences. Results miniplate fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in the anti-stretch, anti-compression, anti-bending, anti-reverse in a few compared with other commonly used fixation method has obvious advantages. Conclusion mini-plate with several other commonly used clinical palm (fingers) compared to bone fracture fixation materials in bio-mechanical properties have obvious advantages
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222