刑事审判程序拒绝预断的两条路径  

Two Different Ways of Refusing the Prejudgment

作　　者：余飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2010年第2期51-54,共4页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：各国刑事审判程序对预断的"拒绝",可分为事前防止和事后排除两种途径。正因如此,认为"大陆法系职权主义刑事诉讼没有预断排除规则"的观点值得商榷。显而易见的是,对事前防止与事后排除的不同侧重,正是两种审判模式对待预断的区别之处。预断的作用机制,在心理学上可用"首因效应"来解释,从预断的发生、防止和排除三个方面入手进行分析十分必要,由此得以阐明两种审判模式拒绝预断的不同进路。并且从法制国家的程序设置来看,拒绝预断只是保障公正审判的诸多手段之一。Generally speaking, there are absolutely two different ways between Continent law system and Anglo- Saxon law system on regarding the judge＇s prejudgment. Obviously, prevention beforehand or elimination afterwards is the different focus of the two judgment modes. The functional mechanism of prejudgment can be psychologically inter- preted by primacy effect. It is necessary to analyze it from the angle of the happening, prevention and elimination of prejudgment. Refusing prejudgment is one of the ways of guaranteeing the fair judgment.

关 键 词：预断 首因效应 审判模式 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]