检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗晓梅[1] 易玉珍[1] 江美霞[1] 方海云[1]
出 处:《现代临床护理》2010年第3期52-53,共2页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的观察开塞露不同肛注方法对功能性便秘患者通便的效果。方法将77例功能性便秘患者随机分为观察组40例和对照组37例,对照组采用传统方法进行开塞露直接肛注,观察组采用改良开塞露法,即在开塞露颈部前端接1根一次性吸痰管后进行肛注,比较两组通便效果。结果两组通便效果比较,P<0.01,差异具有统计学意义,观察组效果优于对照组。结论采用改良开塞露法治疗功能性便秘效果明显优于传统直接肛注法,而且体现了舒适护理在解决患者便秘中的良好效果,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the effects of two different therapeutic methods of glycerine enema on constipation.Methods A total of 77 patients with functional constipation were grouped into the observation group(n = 40) and the control group(n = 37) randomly.Patients in the observation group received modified method,that is,glycerine enema was given by a disposable suction catheter connected to the front neck of enema.And the patients in the control group received direct method per anum.Results The outcome in observation group was superior to that in control group.The difference was significant after the outcomes were observed.Conclusion The modified method is superior to traditional direct method in treating patients with functional constipation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15