全盆底重建术保留与切除子宫68例临床分析  被引量:6

Uterine-reserved or uterine-removed total pelvic floor reconstruction to female pelvic dysfunction:a clinical analysis of 68 cases

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:程大丽[1] 穆庆[1] 夏志军[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院妇产科,辽宁沈阳110004

出  处:《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》2010年第3期219-221,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics

摘  要:目的评估保留与切除子宫的全盆底重建术在治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的有效性和安全性。方法对2008年3月至2009年1月中国医科大学附属盛京医院68例有不同缺陷的女性盆腔器官脱垂患者分别进行保留子宫的全盆底重建术(35例,保留子宫组)及切除子宫的全盆底重建术(33例,切除子宫组)。对合并有压力性尿失禁的患者同时进行经闭孔尿道中段无张力悬吊术(TVT-O术)。根据国际尿控协会制定的盆腔器官脱垂定量POP-Q分度法客观评价手术效果。结果保留子宫组手术时间平均为50min,出血量平均为100mL。切除子宫组手术时间平均为110min,出血量平均为200mL。术后随访(8~18)个月,保留子宫组患者盆底结构基本正常,压力性尿失禁全部治愈,相关症状消失或明显改善,术后无感染发生。切除子宫组症状全部得到纠正,术后有2例感染发生,术后随访患者的盆底结构基本正常,相关症状消失或明显改善。术后3个月POP-Q评分两组较前均明显好转。结论保留子宫的全盆底重建术在保留子宫的同时能完成全盆底结构和功能的全部或部分重建,与切除子宫的全盆底重建术相比手术时间短,恢复快。近期疗效明确,远期疗效仍需观察。Objective To explore the feasibility and effectivenes of uterus-reserving Prolift system. Methods Thirty-five patients with different defects underwent this uterine-reserved prolft reconstruction. Thirty-three patients with different defects underwent another uterine-removed prolft reconstruction. POP-Q was used to evaluate all the patients before or after surgery. Results The average operating time was 50 minutes and hemorrhage volume was 100mL for uterine-reserved group. While the average operating time was 100 minutes and hemorrhage volume was 200mL for uterine-removed group.Correction of all the prolapsed pelvic organs was achieved right after surgery. Norecurrence was observed after an average of ten months follow-up. Only one patient was unsatisfied on objective feeling. Conclusions pelvic floor dysfunction can be treated by Prolift system without removal of uterus. The short-term results are promising.

关 键 词:盆腔器官膨出 盆底重建 子宫脱垂 女性盆底功能障碍性 

分 类 号:R71[医药卫生—妇产科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象