从“编年史”思维定势中走出来——对共和国新闻史的一点想法  

A Critique of the Chronicle Paradigm--Reflect on the Historiography of Journalism since 1949

作　　者：黄旦[1] 瞿轶羿[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学信息与传播研究中心,上海200433

出　　处：《国际新闻界》2010年第3期6-11,共6页Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目<中外传播思想史>(项目编号:01JAZJD860002)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：就当前共和国新闻史的状况看,其最大的问题就是"编年史"的思维,即按照时间顺序,依照已有的结论按次排列所谓的大事,无有研究者自身的理解和分析,带来的最大后果,是研究者失去了自己的提问能力。就客观上而言,此种现象与新闻事业同党和国家的关系密切有关,但从主观看,无疑也有"决定论"的科学史观之影响。The biggest problem of the historiography of Journalism since 1949 is its ＂Chronicle＂ paradigm. That is arranging those so-called great events in chronological order in accordance with the given conclusions, without the researchers＂ own understanding and analysis. The most serious consequence is that the researchers have lost their ability to pose questions. This phenomenon, on the objective aspect, is related to the close relation between the journalism and the Party and state; On the subjective aspect, there is no doubt that it has been affected by the scientific view of history of ＂Determinism＂.

关 键 词：编年史 历史 共和国新闻史 

分 类 号：G219.29[文化科学—新闻学]