检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江医博生物工程有限公司心理研究所,中国杭州310002 [2]浙江省绍兴市第一中学
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2010年第4期447-448,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:绍兴市教育科学2005年规划课题(项目编号:zh05019)
摘 要:目的探讨高一学生人际关系障碍者的人格特点,为中学生这一群体建立良好的人际关系提供科学依据。方法对851名高一学生用症状自评量表(SCL-90)中人际关系敏感分量表和艾森克人格问卷成人版(EPQ)测量,并以人际关系敏感分量表的因子分为依据分为3组,即≥3分组、<3分且≥2分组和<2分组,比较这3组之间EPQ各因子的均分。结果851名高一学生中有23名存在人际关系处理方面的心理障碍,占2.70%;方差分析提示EPQ量表的L、E、N、P因子标准分在3个组间的差异有显著性(F=12.116~135.850,P=0.000)。LSD-t检验L、E、N、P因子在3组之间的差异有显著性(P<0.01~0.001)。结论2.70%高一学生有人际关系障碍,人际关系障碍学生存在高N、P和低L、E的特点。Objective To study the high school student's interpersonal sensitivity influenced by personality traits.Methods A total of 851 high school students were measured with the EPQ and the interpersonal sensitivity scale in Symptom Check-list-90(SCL-90).Then the 851 high school students were divided into three groups(1 group,2 group and 3 group)according to the scores(≥3,3 and≥2,2)of each student's interpersonal sensitivity.Meanwhile,the results of EPQ scores among the three groups were compared with ANOVA.Results The scores of N,P,L and E of EPQ scale were significantly different among the three groups(F=12.116~135.850,P=0.000).Conclusion The higher scores of N,P and the lower scores of L,E of EPQ are personality traits of the interpersonal disorder in high school students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229