检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史栋梁[1]
出 处:《阴山学刊》2010年第2期119-124,共6页Yinshan Academic Journal
摘 要:我国搜查制度呈现出以下三个特征:法律条文规定较多,但缺乏可操作的技术性规定;搜查决定权采取自我控制的监督模式,但缺乏有效的外部制衡;划分了有证搜查和无证搜查,但缺乏内容的充分性的特征。启动搜查程序无明确的证明标准、刑事案件证明标准较高和协力型的诉讼结构是造成非法搜查的重要原因。通过调整无证搜查的条件,增设同意搜查制度,设置不同层次的搜查理由和证明标准,由检察院行使搜查审批权,制定具有可操作性的搜查执行程序,彻底贯彻非法证据排除规则等途径,可以健全我国的搜查制度。The following three features of searching system in China appear like that: there are many legal provisions but the operational technical requirements are inadequate;the decision-making rights of search adopt the supervision model of self-control,but lack the effective external constraints and measures;the search with warrant and without warrant are differentiated but the character of adequate content is deficient.From the perspective of lawsuit structure and standard of testification,the author points out that the absence of clear and definite standard of testification in search procedure,the high proof standard of criminal cases and the third-party-type of lawsuit are the crucial reasons of the illegal search.By adjusting the conditions of search without warrant,adding consent search system,setting up search reason of different levels and standards of testification,the Procuratorate exercises the search approval rights,formulates the operative search enforcement procedures and implements the rule of excluding illegally obtained testification thoroughly to improve the search system in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28