与林伯谦先生论《文选》的编者问题——《由〈文选序〉辨析选学若干疑案》商兑之二  

On the Compilers of Zhaoming Anthology of Literature:A Comment on Lin Boqian's Argument

作　　者：力之[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第2期6-12,共7页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：广西"人文强桂"建设工程项目"<文选>研究"(桂科软05111001)

摘　　要：对道宣"照录"刘孝孙说"刘孝绰撰《诗苑》"之序作综合考察,便知据此无法证"刘孝绰主编《诗苑》"。以由"太子独使孝绰集而序之"说证其不能撰《文选》,犹科学家走出实验室而忘记了科学常识。"《诗苑》就是《诗苑英华》",而以此作刘孝绰为《文选》实际编纂者的"关键核心"无任何实质性意义,根本动摇不了萧统撰《文选》说。从总集编撰的实质性层面上考察,昭明太子完全可凭一己之力完成《文选》。A comprehensive study of Daoxuan＇s literal copy of Liu Xiaosun＇s comment on the preface to ＂On the Compilation of Shiyuan by Liu Xiaochuo＂ may discover that the evidence is incapable of testifying Liu Xiaochuo as the chief compiler of Shiyuan. To quote ＂ the crown prince willing the compilation and prefacing by Liu only＂ as a testimony that the prince didn＇t compile Zhaoming Anthology of Literature is like ignoring the common sense of science just after walking out of the lab. ＂Shiyuan is actually Shiyuan Yinghua＇, so Liu Xiaochuo is the core compiler of Zhaoming Anthology of Literature--this conclusion holds no water and forms no challenge to the view that Xiao Tong is the compiler. In the eyes of the practical compilation of the book, Zhaoming the crown prince was surely able to finish it on his own.

关 键 词：林伯谦 《文选》 编者问题 《诗苑》 刘孝绰 《颜氏家训》 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]