检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属医院感染内科,湛江524001
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志(下旬版)》2010年第4期1-2,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基 金:湛江市科技攻关课题(2007C01007)
摘 要:目的探索饮食干预对青年乙型肝炎(乙肝)患者疗效及生活质量的影响。方法选取106例乙肝患者,随机分为干预组和对照组各53例;对照组采用药物+常规饮食,干预组采用药物+饮食干预;干预后30d对2组进行疗效及生活质量评定量表(SV-36)评定。结果干预组治愈29例,治愈率54.72%,对照组治愈16例,治愈率30.19%;干预组生活质量总分(69.72±8.42)分,对照组生活质量总分(55.71±8.31)分,2组在情绪角色、躯体功能、躯体疼痛、活力、社会功能、心理健康、总体健康等维度比较差异显著。结论乙肝患者通过饮食调护,能够提高临床疗效,改善生活质量。Objective To explore the effect of dietary intervention on treatment effect and life quality of young patients with hepatitis B. Methods 106 cases of hepatitis B patients were randomly divided into the intervention group and the control group, each group with 53 cases. The patients in the control group were given medication treatment and conventional diet, while the intervention group was given medication treatment plus dietary intervention. The therapeutic effect and quality of life were evaluated between the two groups 30 days after the intervention. Results 29 cases in the intervention group were cured (54.72%),while only 16 cases in the control group (30.19%) were cured. The total score of life quality in the intervention group was (69.72 ± 8.42),and (55.71 ± 8.31 ) in the control group. Significant difference existed in subsequent dimensionality: emotional role, bodily function,bodily pain, vitality, social function, mental health and general health between the two groups. Conclusions Clinical efficacy can be improved and quality of life can be enhanced through dietary intervention in patients with hepatitis B.
分 类 号:R16[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188